AirbusA350-900 vs. Boeing 737-800. Values may not be 100% accurate. Engine thrust, MTOW and range (full load) based on best options available. Passanger capacity in standard 3-class layout for widebodies and 2-class for narrowbodies (including A300, A310). AirbusA330-200 vs. Boeing 787-8. Values may not be 100% accurate. Engine thrust, MTOW and range (full load) based on best options available. Passanger capacity in standard 3-class layout for widebodies and 2-class for narrowbodies (including A300, A310). The737 Next Generation – the 737-600, 700, 800 and 900 The Next Generation (NG) series was launched in 1993 (first flying in 1997). This came about mainly to address growing competition from the Airbus A320 TheBoeing 737 is a bit smaller with a 148″ fuselage and only 139″ in the cabin. This means that the Airbus A320 has 7 more inches of width than the Boeing 737. If an airline did Boeing737-800 vs. Boeing 717-200HGW. Values may not be 100% accurate. Engine thrust, MTOW and range (full load) based on best options available. Passanger capacity in standard 3-class layout for widebodies and 2-class for narrowbodies (including A300, A310). The787, though, is a significantly larger and heavier aircraft than the A320. The 787 is also much newer as it first went into service in 2011, compared to 1988 for the A320. In this article, I’ll compare these two aircraft from a number of different perspectives, including physical attributes, range, orders, and customers. Airbusaircraft models; Boeing customer codes; ICAO codes classification; ICAO registration prefixes; Airbus A320-200 versus Airbus A320neo; 37.57 m: 123 ft 3 in: length: 37.57 m: 123 ft 3 in: 34.10 m: 111 ft 10 in: wingspan: 35.80 m: 117 ft 5 in: 122.60 m 2: 1,320 ft 2: wingarea: 123.00 m 2: 1,324 ft 2: 11.70 m: Butafraid of losing sales to European rival Airbus, which was marketing a more fuel-efficient version of its similarly sized A320, Boeing decided to take the shorter Vay Tiền Trả Góp Theo Tháng Chỉ Cần Cmnd.

airbus a320 200 vs boeing 737 800